WESTERN CHERRY FRUIT FLY (Rhagoletis indifferens {Curran}) and Its Management in the Pacific Northwest United States of America.
|
![]() |
Timothy J. Smith
Washington State University, 400 Washington Street,
Wenatchee, WA 98801,
United States of America......................................More Information:
.
Overview:
Introduction Western cherry fruit fly is native to North America, and has been found in the Pacific Northwest states since This fly has a single generation per season, emerging from the soil under the host tree for about eight weeks, with emergence peaking around sweet cherry harvest time. During the peak emergence period, about 15 to 20 percent of the population emerges each week. The adult emerges from the pupae which has over-wintered about 2 to 10 cm below the soil surface. Almost all emerging adults stay on the closest host, but will disperse if there is no fruit on the tree, or if the host has been removed. The adults live on the host tree, consuming micro-organisms and pollen grains from the leaf surfaces, aphid excretions, and cherry fruit wounds. Bird droppings are an important food source, as nitrogen and protein is not easily found in other foraged food items. Female cherry fruit fly often create feeding sites by wounding the fruit with their ovipositors, without inserting an egg. Adults are most active on relatively warm days with light or no wind. They can fly several hundred meters searching for a new host, but most remain near their emergence site. After about five to ten days feeding, maturation and mating, they begin to lay eggs. Most egg laying occurs after the early to mid-season cultivar fruit begins to turn yellow-green. Egg deposition starts in green fruit about the same time on the later varieties (Frick, 1954), so fruit development stage should not be used as a timing method for first spray covers. Most cherry fruit fly in the Pacific Northwest USA are found in non-commercial sweet or tart cherry trees planted in home orchards. Few hobby orchardists have the ambition, knowledge or equipment necessary to control this pest. Pest populations can be greatly reduced in a region by organized efforts to identify and treat or remove these wild or neglected host trees. Cherry growers are often advised to hang traps in their orchards to monitor CFF populations, and document emergence. This is poor advice. Traps are not an effective control or monitoring device in commercial orchards, as they are for many other pests. The available traps do not attract flies well, as they rely on visual cues and mildly attractive odors to attract the pest, rather than the far more effective pheromones. Cherry fruit flies have no sexual attractant pheromones. The only pheromone the female cherry fruit fly produces is a repellant, most likely used to indicate to others that an egg has been deposited into a specific fruit. The two most commonly used traps are yellow, two sided, 8 x 12 inch rectangles or red 4 inch spheres, covered with a sticky substance and baited with ammonium carbonate (Mayer, et al., 2000). These traps are used to monitor first emergence of adults on infested trees. Attempts by the author (and others) to control populations of cherry fruit fly by the placement of numerous traps in infested trees have not been successful. Biological Control Effective biological control agents have been not been identified. There is a current research effort to develop control programs aimed at the over-wintering pupal stage, utilizing specific nematodes known to attack insect pupae. These methods have not proven effective to date. Many isolated cherry trees remain free of infestation due to the complete removal of fruit each season by birds. Chemical Control The advent of the US Federal Food Quality Protection Act has caused special concern to sweet cherry growers, as the two products most commonly used to control cherry fruit fly, azinphos-methyl and carbaryl, are receiving special regulatory attention during the evaluation process, due to their very common usage on high-consumption crops. It is likely that azinphos methyl will be greatly reduced or dropped as an alternative within the next few years. Alternative, effective, and environmentally acceptable cherry fruit fly control materials and methods continue to be researched and developed. (see report) Growers continue to spray every week to ten days, depending on product used, until harvest is completed. Usually, one or two sprays are applied post harvest to disrupt the attack on unharvested fruit. A bait (GF-120NF, see report) should be considered residual, as it is an attractive substance with spinosad as the active ingredient. It is lethal to flies that feed on it while "grazing" on the tree. This bait is "squirted" and spattered on the trees weekly at 20 fluid ounces per acre diluted in about 60 to 80 fluid ounces of water per acre. (application rig) Dimethoate is the only registered product that can control the larvae inside the fruit, and is most effective when applied within a week after harvest. Recent research by the author has found that other products may also control larvae inside of fruit, and these may soon be recommended for post-harvest "clean-up" sprays in orchards. Non-residual, "knock-down" products are usually applied by air or ground sprayer about every week to prevent egg laying. Products that kill flies both by contact and residue are generally applied by air-blast sprayer every 10-14 days. Careful planning is necessary as harvest nears, as pre-harvest intervals, export restrictions, and control leading up to and during extended harvest must be taken into consideration. Most control failures occur in the last 10 days prior to, and during harvest. There is no evidence of resistance to any insecticide in the Pacific Northwest cherry fruit fly population. As biological controls have been ineffective to date, reducing the potential impact of cherry fruit fly control has recently centered on the assessment and registration of alternative spray control products. While formerly "organic" products such as rotenone and piperonyl butoxide have recently been taken off of the market, very effective, but less toxic, products such as spinosad (Success, Entrust) and nicotinal class insecticides (imidacloprid, Provado) are being registered. Horticultural summer weight mineral oils at 1 percent solution, sprayed weekly, controlled cherry fruit fly on heavily infested trees, but dulled the skin of the fruit, rendering it commercially unacceptable. Most newly registered products have pre-harvest spray intervals of seven or more days, leaving the grower with few choices near and during harvest. A worthy exception to this is the GF-120NF bait, which has a 0 day re-entry and pre-harvest interval. The GF-120 bait has also proven very effective and practical as a control for CFF on home garden cherry trees. Concluding Remarks This pest causes very limited direct damage to cherry fruit. It is, perhaps, the most successfully controlled tree fruit pest in the Pacific Northwest USA. However, due to the large populations that survive on neglected trees, cessation of control efforts would lead to rapid infestation of commercial orchards, and complete loss of this major crop. Research continues to find better monitoring tools and less toxic control options. Due to a zero tolerance for infestation due to quarantines, intensive spray programs are likely to continue as the major management approach.
Beers, E.H., Brunner, J.F., Willett, M.J., and Warner, G.M., 1993. Orchard pest management, a resource book for the Pacific Northwest. Good Fruit Grower, 276 pp. Frick, K.E., Simkover, H.G., and Telford, H.S., 1954. Bionomics of the cherry fruit flies in Eastern Washington. Washington State University Tech. Bul. 13, 66 pp. Jones V.P., Alston D.G., Davis D.W, Brunner J.F., Shelton M.E., 1991. Phenology of western cherry fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Utah & Washington. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 84: 488-492. Mayer, D.F., Long, L.E., Smith, T.J., Olsen, J., Riedl, H., Heath, R., Leskey, T., and Prokopy, R.J., 2000. Attraction of adult Rhagoletis indifferens (Diptera: Tephritidae) to unbaited and odor-baited red spheres and yellow rectangles. J. Econ. Entomol. 93(2): 347-351.
|